UK - new government, new policies, old problems

08 July 2024

UK - new government, new policies, old problems

Britain’s new government has big ambitions for the UK economy. It wants to make the UK the fastest-growing economy in the group of seven industrialised economies by the end of the parliament. This would involve raising UK growth from an average of 1.3% a year to more than 2.0%, the rate that is seen as the norm for the US. Faster growth would help unlock the UK’s core problems of stagnating real incomes and deteriorating public services. Labour also wants to ensure greater economic stability, what Rachel Reeves, the new chancellor, calls “securonomics”. 

  • Labour has been explicit in describing its ambitions for the economy, but they are not original. Every government aspire to faster, more stable growth. Few achieve it.
  • Much of the commentary since the election has focused on the difficulties facing the new government. The UK today is a far removed from the high growth, low tax economy that Tony Blair’s Labour government inherited from the Conservatives in 1997. Before turning to the challenges facing the new government, we should consider the positives.
  • First, the UK and EU economies are recovering after a sustained period of weakness. The UK’s brief, shallow recession ended in the first quarter of this year with a blistering 0.7% increase in GDP, far faster than in any G7 economy. That is likely to prove a one-off, but we expect UK growth to run at around trend, or normal rates, for the rest of this year and through next. Inflation hit growth and spending power in the last couple of years but is now in retreat. From a late 2022 peak of 11.1% inflation fell to just 2.0% in May. With earnings increasing by almost 6.0% year on year, real household incomes are rising rapidly for the first time since the economy bounced back from the pandemic in 2021.
  • Second, the new government is unlikely to have to deal with the magnitude of the problems that afflicted the UK in the last parliament. The pandemic, the invasion of Ukraine, the energy crisis and the ensuing surge in inflation represent the greatest threats to growth and stability since the war. The next five years will bring shocks, but the new government would be exceptionally unlucky to find itself grappling with the scale of the problems that beset its predecessor.
  • Third, with Labour’s landslide parliamentary majority and the swift transfer of power the election is likely to pave the way for a period of relative political stability. This is in contrast to the situation in the US ahead of the elections on 5 November and, in the wake of the European elections, in continental Europe. No one expects a repeat of the UK’s three prime minister record of the last parliament. 
  • Labour’s opportunity is that it comes to office after a period of exceptionally poor economic performance and as the economy is finally turning up. It is a measure of the weakness of the UK economy that it has underperformed even Italy, the growth laggard of Europe, since 2019. In the last parliament UK GDP grew by just 1.7% while real incomes were actually lower in early 2024 than they were in late 2019.
  • Assuming an absence of large external shocks it should not be hard to better this over the next five years.
  • We should not underestimate the restorative power of sustained economic growth. If the UK could sustain growth of even 1.3% over the lifetime of this parliament the economy would be almost 7% bigger in five years’ time than today.
  • This is not an argument for complacency. Events may yet derail growth. A return to 1.3% growth will not achieve the new government’s aims and is unlikely to meet public expectations. Labour wants to raise the UK’s growth rate substantially, partly in order to repair what Sir Keir Starmer described as Britain’s “broken” public services.
  • In a recent interview with the Financial Times, Ms Reeves described growth as “the only way out of this mess” and rejected the idea of a major increase in public spending funded by debt or taxes: “Borrowing more is not an alternative because debt as a share of GDP is the highest it’s been since the 1960s” while raising taxes was “not an alternative because tax is already at a 70-year high”.
  • This would seem to preclude the sort of big fiscal easing undertaken by the Biden administration through debt-funded spending on infrastructure, renewables and semiconductors.
  • Labour plans relatively modest tax rises, yielding just under £9bn. According to the manifesto, this will be funded through reduced tax avoidance, changes to the taxation of UK non-domiciled residents, applying VAT to independent school fees, a windfall tax on oil and gas companies and a higher tax rate for private equity carried interest. Labour also plans a small increase in public borrowing of £3.5bn.
  • £9bn of tax rises and £3.5bn of borrowing would give the new government just £12bn of extra public expenditure, small beer when total public expenditure is running at £1,226bn. Revealingly, most of the extra money, £7.3bn, has been earmarked for current spending, on the NHS, social care and schools.
  • That leaves just £5bn for spending designed to raise growth – a ‘Green Prosperity Fund’ including the creation of a publicly-owned company, Great British Energy, and a National Wealth Fund tasked with investing in green energy, infrastructure and industry. Great British Energy and the National Wealth Fund would aim to attract private sector capital to investment alongside public funds. 
  • Other elements in Labour’s growth plan would come at little or no cost to the exchequer – reform of the planning system to increase levels of housebuilding, improving UK-EU trade relations (though not rejoining either the Single Market or the Customs Union), greater devolution and increased coordination between Westminster and the nations and regions of the UK. 
  • Arguably the most radical element in Labour’s manifesto relates to the Party’s commitment to a “new deal for working people”. Labour aims to increase workers’ rights and job security with a sweeping set of reforms. Probably the most significant would be to give employees protection against unfair dismissal from the first day of employment. Currently, in most cases, eligibility is limited to those who have worked for an employer for at least two years. Critics warn that the proposal could make employers, especially smaller companies, wary of taking on staff. Labour says that employers would still be able to dismiss staff during a probationary period and that it plans to consult on these and other employment proposals.
  • In its analysis of Labour proposals to expand some benefits, including statutory sick pay and maternity pay, the Institute for Fiscal Studies argues on the basis of previous such reforms much or all of the costs would be borne by employees in the form of lower wages. The IFS acknowledges the potential benefits of raising benefits but cautions that, these policies are “not a free lunch for workers”. 
  • One of the many challenges for the new government will be to increase employment protection in a way that does not weigh on job creation and productivity.
  • There is probably scope for Ms Reeves to raise public expenditure beyond her current plans. Labour’s current commitment to hold the rates of income tax, national insurance, VAT and corporation tax and not to “increase taxes on working people” would arguably not preclude extending the scope of VAT, raising capital gains tax, inheritance tax or, perhaps, even council tax. It would also be possible to impose windfall taxes on banks or other companies or increase taxes on pensions.
  • The problem is that taxes are already at the highest as a share of GDP since 1949 and, even before Labour’s planned tax increases of £8.6bn, are due to rise by a further £23.5bn due to the decision by the previous chancellor to freeze personal allowances until 2027/28. Ms Reeves has given no indication that she plans to row back from her predecessor’s commitment. The UK is not the low-tax economy it was when Labour last won a landslide, back in 1997.
  • Ms Reeves could also consider some easing of the fiscal rules, perhaps to allow greater borrowing for investment. Writing in the Financial Times the former chief economist of the Bank of England, Andy Haldane, argued for just such a change saying that, “existing fiscal rules risk starving the economy of the very investment needed to boost medium-term growth”. But with public debt running at around 100% of GDP, the highest level in 60 years, Ms Reeves scope for further increasing levels of public sector borrowing seems relatively limited.
  • Despite high levels of public spending, dissatisfaction with public services is rife. The extra £7bn of public spending Labour plans on services is dwarfed by £18bn of cuts to so-called non-protected spending departments, such as transport, justice and local government, already baked into the fiscal arithmetic by the previous chancellor. One of many decisions Ms Reeves will have to make in her budget in September or October will be whether to go ahead with those spending cuts. No wonder that Sir Keir Starmer warns that repairing public services will take time.
  • A more stable domestic environment, an absence of big shocks and a recovering economy should all help the new government. But to improve public services and incomes without big increases in taxes or borrowing, Labour needs faster growth. That is a worthy, but daunting goal.

OUR REVIEW OF LAST WEEK’S NEWS
The UK FTSE 100 equity index ended the week up 0.5% at 8,204.

Economics

  • The US economy added 206,000 jobs in June, slightly above expectations, but a higher unemployment rate and softer growth in earnings point to a cooling job market
  • Minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting in June showed that officials believed “price pressures were diminishing” but more evidence was needed that inflationary pressures were sustainable before beginning to cut rates
  • The first estimate of euro area inflation for June came in at 2.5%, down from 2.6% easing inflation concerns
  • UK house prices fell 0.2% from May to June following two months of unchanged prices, according to estimates from Halifax. A rise in mortgage rates since the start of the year has weighed on activity
  • Euro area house prices rose 0.4% in the first quarter of the year with growth driven by rising prices in the south and east of the monetary bloc
  • Hurricane Beryl caused extensive property damage and at least ten deaths across the Caribbean
  • French business confidence fell to a five-month low ahead of elections
  • EU tariffs of up to 47.6% on electric car imports from China came into force on Thursday. Some Chinese EV manufacturers are planning to move production into the EU to avoid tariffs
  • The European Commission is considering scrapping the €150 duty-free threshold on imports from China that has benefitted Chinese online retailers, the FT reports
  • The Portuguese government announced that it would reintroduce tax breaks aimed at attracting highly skilled foreign workers
  • Turkish inflation fell to 71.6% in the 12 months to June, the first fall in 8 months, following a tack back to orthodox monetary policy earlier in the year

Business

  • Cineworld is considering closing up to 25 cinemas in the UK as it struggles with debt servicing costs, a fall in new film releases due to last year’s Hollywood strikes and the legacy of the pandemic, the FT reports
  • UK Finance called for the government to claw back state support to UK companies that choose to list abroad
  • The state oil companies of Saudi Arabia and UAE are reportedly considering bidding for the Australian gas producer Santos
  • Sales at Tesla dropped 4.8% in the second quarter compared with previous year as the world’s largest electric carmaker faces increasing competition from new and established manufacturers
  • The owners of approximately a third of US nuclear power stations are in talks with AI companies as the AI boom demands an ever-increasing amount of power, the WSJ reports
  • Morgan Stanley is dropping a cap on bonuses for its bankers working in London after the UK government’s decision last year to drop restrictions
  • Germany blocked the sale of MAN Energy Solution’s gas turbine business to a Chinese company on national security grounds

Global and political developments

  • Exit polls suggest that France is heading to a hung parliament after a leftist coalition appeared on course to win the most seats in parliament. If confirmed the outcome would be a major surprise and a blow for the right-wing National Rally of Marine Le Pen which had hoped to be the dominant party in the parliament. It could also presage a period of political deadlock, with no single bloc commanding a parliamentary majority
  • The UK Labour Party won a landslide parliamentary victory, winning the second-largest majority since 1935 – albeit on the lowest vote share for a winning party in any election since at least 1945 and on a low voter turnout
  • The Conservative Party’s share of the vote dropped to its lowest level since its formation in 1834
  • The UK Liberal Democrats gained an additional 64 seats with significant gains in Southern England. Reform won 5 seats and the Greens 4
  • The Scottish National Party lost 38 seats leaving them with just 9
  • US president Joe Biden said he would continue with his bid for re-election in November despite pressure to stand aside
  • The US Supreme Court ruled that presidents cannot be prosecuted for official acts taken while in office meaning that it is unlikely that former president Donald Trump will face another criminal trial prior to elections in November 
  • The Bank for International Settlements warned that rising government debt levels exposed financial markets to the risk of a crisis similar to that hit the UK in 2022. The BIS urged governments to start reducing debt levels
  • Hezbollah launched a rocket and drone attack at an Israeli military base after Israel killed a senior Hezbollah commander in southern Lebanon

And finally… media in Germany, a country where cash is still widely used for payments, reported last week that police were called to a bar in Bavaria after a Latvian man ordered 16 beers and paid for them each individually by card. The landlord was reportedly unhappy with the fees that each transaction incurred – trouble with the bill